Senate Proceeding on Jul 16th, 2009 :: 5:15:50 to 5:18:20
Total video length: 13 hours 5 minutes Stream Tools: Stream Overview | Edit Time

Note: MetaVid video transcripts may contain inaccuracies, help us build a more perfect archive

Download OptionsEmbed Video

Views:76 Duration: 0:02:30 Discussion

Previous speech:

Next speech:

5:15:46 to 5:15:51( Edit History Discussion )

James Webb: her

5:15:50 to 5:18:20( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: Jim Bunning

5:15:52 to 5:16:12( Edit History Discussion )

Jim Bunning: disposition that rests uns with the weighty issues o appeal. the opinion was only one paragraph long. when the supreme court issued its case it was 34 pages long. in one case i mentioned above

5:16:13 to 5:16:33( Edit History Discussion )

Jim Bunning: she joined the summary panel opinion and discarded the requested of the second amendment as a fundamental rht in a one-sentence footnote. ithis is unacceptable. what is perhaps the

5:16:34 to 5:16:54( Edit History Discussion )

Jim Bunning: brief investigations of the law was that they affected very important cases and very important issues. for instance, in the ricci case could become the action case of this generation

5:16:55 to 5:17:15( Edit History Discussion )

Jim Bunning: and it received only a one-paragraph analysis from judge sotomayor. her casual second amendment cases filed in the face of the efforts the supreme court has put in these decisions. the united states supreme court

5:17:16 to 5:17:38( Edit History Discussion )

Jim Bunning: is the legal decisions and a justice must pvide explanation and insight to the country open how and why they did. judge sotomayor did not do that

5:17:39 to 5:17:59( Edit History Discussion )

Jim Bunning: for these extremely important cases. this will be the first time i have ever voted against a supreme not happy that i have to do so. however, it is constitutional role of the senate to provide confirmation

5:18:00 to 5:18:21( Edit History Discussion )

Jim Bunning: for this position and my duty as a senator to be part of this process. on sotomayor i do not find her to be a suitable candidate for justice of the supreme court of the united states and will vote