Senate Proceeding on Jul 23rd, 2009 :: 9:13:25 to 9:14:55
Total video length: 13 hours 40 minutes Stream Tools: Stream Overview | Edit Time

Note: MetaVid video transcripts may contain inaccuracies, help us build a more perfect archive

Views:16 Duration: 0:01:30 Discussion

Previous speech:

Next speech:

9:13:17 to 9:13:38( Edit History Discussion )

Lindsey Graham: the amendment is agreed to. mr. levin: move to reconsider. mr. graham: move to table. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. levin: the next amendment now, i the presiding of senator from michigan. mr. levin: the sessions amendment. the presiding officer: the senator from south carolina. mr. graham: i'd like to call amendment 1567 as modified. the presiding officer: the clerk will report.

9:13:25 to 9:14:55( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: Lindsey Graham

9:13:39 to 9:14:00( Edit History Discussion )

Lindsey Graham: the clerk: mr. graham for mr. sessions proposes amendment numbered 1657 as modified. the presiding officer: the senator from south carolina. mr. graham: we have been work w-g senator sessions, senator levin and his staff. this amendment basically clarifies the fact that when a

9:14:01 to 9:14:23( Edit History Discussion )

Lindsey Graham: detainee is in military custody or an intelligence age's custody, being detained as a result of wartime activity to be interrogated for intelligence gathering, there is no requirement that that person have article 31 or miranda rights read to them. we don't want to criminalize the war. military intelligenc

9:14:24 to 9:14:45( Edit History Discussion )

Lindsey Graham: is not a war function. there's been confusion about the department of justice, f.b.i. agents reading miranda rights. clearly there could be a time when that would be appropriate. but this amendment states that miranda warnings or article 31 rights are not to be read by d.o.d. personnelr intelligence

9:14:46 to 9:14:57( Edit History Discussion )

Lindsey Graham: agencies as a result of battlefield activities or military intelligence gathering. and i think it is a good amendment that will potentially confusing situation.