Metavid

Video archive of the US Congress

Senate Proceeding on Aug 5th, 2009 :: 4:16:35 to 4:19:19
Total video length: 5 hours 41 minutes Stream Tools: Stream Overview | Edit Time

Note: MetaVid video transcripts may contain inaccuracies, help us build a more perfect archive

Download OptionsEmbed Video

Views:142 Duration: 0:02:44 Discussion

Previous speech: Next speech:

4:16:30 to 4:16:35( Edit History Discussion )

House Clerk: deference accorded to the president. th difficult question.

Susan Collins

4:16:35 to 4:19:19( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: Susan Collins

Susan Collins

4:16:36 to 4:16:58( Edit History Discussion )

Susan Collins: some argue that by the to the president is required when confirming judicial nominees, not only bec federal judges are in a separate branch of government but also because they have lifetime appointments. thus, constitutional law scholar

Susan Collins

4:16:59 to 4:17:20( Edit History Discussion )

Susan Collins: john mcguiness concludes that the text of the constitution gives the senate complete and final discretion in whether to accept or approve a many other legal scholars, however, articulate a more constrained role for the senate. they argue that the senate's

Susan Collins

4:17:21 to 4:17:42( Edit History Discussion )

Susan Collins: powers should be exercised narrowly, giving extraordinary deference to the president. under this standard, the would not reject judicial nominees unless they were clearly unqualified to serve. citing alexander

Susan Collins

4:17:43 to 4:18:03( Edit History Discussion )

Susan Collins: federalist 76, those who would constrain the senate's review of judicial nominee advice and consent responsibility was only intended as a incompetence, cronyism, or corruption. as dr. john eastman testified

Susan Collins

4:18:04 to 4:18:24( Edit History Discussion )

Susan Collins: fore the judiciary committee in 2003, the senate's power to advice and consent does quote -- "give the senate a coequal role in the appointment of federal judges." mr. president, the constitutional arguments on both

Susan Collins

4:18:25 to 4:18:46( Edit History Discussion )

Susan Collins: sides of this question on how much deference to give the president are help lightning. but as is so often the case, my personal -- president are enlightening. but as is so often the case, my personal belief is that the truth lies between t as a senator, i have afforded conserable deference to both

Susan Collins

4:18:47 to 4:19:08( Edit History Discussion )

Susan Collins: democrat and republican presidents on their supreme court nominees. in considering judicial nominees, i carefully consider the nominee's qualifications, competency, personal integrity,

Susan Collins

4:19:09 to 4:19:20( Edit History Discussion )

Susan Collins: respect for precedence. those are the tests that i have applied to sony sonia sotomayor. having reviewed her record, questioned her personally, and

Personal tools

MetaVid is a non-profit project of UC Santa Cruz and the Sunlight Foundation. Learn more About MetaVid

The C-SPAN logo and other servicemarks that may be found in video content are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Metavid