Metavid

Video archive of the US Congress

Senate Proceeding on Nov 16th, 2006 :: 4:28:36 to 4:33:20
Total video length: 6 hours 12 minutes Stream Tools: Stream Overview | Edit Time

Note: MetaVid video transcripts may contain inaccuracies, help us build a more perfect archive

Download OptionsEmbed Video

Views:58 Duration: 0:04:44 Discussion

Previous speech: Next speech:

Byron Dorgan

4:22:46 to 4:28:36( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: Byron Dorgan

Byron Dorgan

4:28:26 to 4:28:36( Edit History Discussion )

Byron Dorgan: we will not decide today as a united states senate to say that security council resolution 1172 doesn't matter because it's old. it is timeless. it is not old. it is timeless in its position of what we should

Joseph Biden

4:28:36 to 4:28:51( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: stand for as a country. mr. president, i yield the floor. mr. biden: mr. president? the presiding officer: the senator from delaware is recognized. mr. biden: i'll be very brief. i -- as i said, i

Joseph Biden

4:28:36 to 4:33:20( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: Joseph Biden

Joseph Biden

4:28:51 to 4:29:06( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: really admire, respect, and observe the passion of my friend from north dakota on this issue, but i think he's -- the comparisons are not particularly apt. the wing strut the senator has was able

Joseph Biden

4:29:06 to 4:29:23( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: to be held in his hand because two countries -- the united states and the soviet union -- concluded that it was in their mutual interest to cease and desist and/or significantly reduce the threat each

Joseph Biden

4:29:23 to 4:29:39( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: posed to the other. and they were the only threats that existed, the only threat to the united states because of the nuclear capable when icbm or backfire bomber resided in the soviet union. we tried.

Joseph Biden

4:29:39 to 4:29:55( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: i was the author of, and as a matter of fact there was a south dakota senator named pressler along with john glenn who early on put in legislation relating to sanctions for india. india obviously violated

Joseph Biden

4:29:55 to 4:30:19( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: those sanctions and did not comply with the u.n. resolution, but there is a reason for that. not a justification, a reason. they looked across their border, north and west and saw two nuclear powers.

Joseph Biden

4:30:19 to 4:30:30( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: one emerging nuclear power, one existing nuclear power. and they concluded rightly or wrongly that they had to be a nuclear power. it is clear nonproliferation does not work in a vacuum. nonproliferation,

Joseph Biden

4:30:30 to 4:30:42( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: entreatments , requests proddings to a nation that found itself in a situation where they believe they are threatened by a nuclear neighbor have not worked particularly well offering those two examples,

Joseph Biden

4:30:42 to 4:30:57( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: for example. it seems to me what we're attempting to do here is the only route to get to the point where both india and pakistan are part of the nonproliferation treaty. and that is we're trying

Joseph Biden

4:30:57 to 4:31:13( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: to change the situation, the regional situation on the ground. it's not going to happen through a nonproliferation treaty. it's going to happen through a reproachment between india and pakistan. and

Joseph Biden

4:31:13 to 4:31:26( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: the idea that we would be able to, through any legislation, prevent india from moving forward to add additional nuclear weapons if they so choose to do that is -- there is no legislation we can pass to

Joseph Biden

4:31:26 to 4:31:40( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: do that. what this legislation does is recognize the reality of the geopolitical situation in the region, set up safeguards to deal with the ability for india to use anything we are doing with them

Joseph Biden

4:31:40 to 4:31:58( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: to be able to further advance their nuclear capability, give them a new buy-in to an international regime that will have the effect, i believe, of putting pressure on them to move in the direction

Joseph Biden

4:31:58 to 4:32:18( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: that we in the soviets moved on back when that backfire bomber strut was sawed-off a wing, and that's the route we choose. it is not pretty. it is not -- it is not clear. it is no guarantee. it is

Joseph Biden

4:32:18 to 4:32:39( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: not -- it is not certain to succeed. but i do know one thing. absent this agreement, there is a likelihood that things get worse instead of better beyond what may already occur. and so i appreciate the

Joseph Biden

4:32:39 to 4:32:53( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: senator's comparisons, but i think they're not as apt as they might appear to be because, again, india's motivation in terms of its viewing its need for a nuclear arsenal is not unlike the motivation

Joseph Biden

4:32:53 to 4:33:03( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: that existed with regard to the united states and the soviet union. and it's going to take a geopolitical settlement of that, not a nuclear arms control agreement he imposing a settlement on india

Joseph Biden

4:33:03 to 4:33:11( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: and pakistan at this moment now that the genie's out of the bottle. but i appreciate my friend's point. i respect his point of view, but i disagree with the best way to move forward. mr. dorgan: mr.

Joseph Biden

4:33:11 to 4:33:20( Edit History Discussion )

Joseph Biden: president? the presiding officer: the senator from north dakota is recognized. mr. dorgan: mr. president, let me respond briefly to that. there is a very big difference between this and the agreement

Byron Dorgan

4:33:20 to 4:33:32( Edit History Discussion )

Byron Dorgan: we had with the soviet union. in the soviet union agreement, both sides -- the united states and the soviet union -- decided they wished to reduce the number of nuclear weapons and reduce the delivery

Byron Dorgan

4:33:20 to 4:35:20( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: Byron Dorgan

Personal tools

MetaVid is a non-profit project of UC Santa Cruz and the Sunlight Foundation. Learn more About MetaVid

The C-SPAN logo and other servicemarks that may be found in video content are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Metavid