Metavid

Video archive of the US Congress

Senate Proceeding on Nov 17th, 2009 :: 1:08:40 to 1:21:35
Total video length: 1 hours 32 minutes Stream Tools: Stream Overview | Edit Time

Note: MetaVid video transcripts may contain inaccuracies, help us build a more perfect archive

Download OptionsEmbed Video

Views:17 Duration: 0:12:55 Discussion

Previous speech: Next speech:

James Inhofe

1:08:37 to 1:08:59( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: of things to get to. before we can d to defeat this $3 trillion monstrosity. floor. the presiding officer: the

James Inhofe

1:08:40 to 1:21:35( Edit History Discussion )
Speech By: James Inhofe

James Inhofe

1:09:00 to 1:09:20( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: senator from oklahoma. mr. inhofe: mr. president, i during the course of the day toda do this since it's my birthday -- i had about five different subjects i wasoing to want to cover. let me make one comment about the talk that was just given, a very eloquent speech that was just given by the senator from south dakota.

James Inhofe

1:09:21 to 1:09:41( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: i think the thing that surprises most people -- the presidg officer: without objection. mr. inhofe: that surprises most people is that we'll have meetings and people will say wait a minute, you don't even know what is in the senate bill, that it's being written up behind closed doors. so the comments that we're making, most of them refer to the b house.

James Inhofe

1:09:42 to 1:10:04( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: and the only reason for that is that's the only thing we have to talk about. recognized until such time as we move on -- i 11:20. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. inhofe: first of all, let me just mention right after the conferenceunches, we're going

James Inhofe

1:10:05 to 1:10:25( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: to have amendment having to do with the the -- with gitmo. mr. president, this is a very simple one-page amendment that states that none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this act -- this is on the milcon -- or any prior act may be used to construct

James Inhofe

1:10:26 to 1:10:47( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: modify a facility or facilities in the united states or its territories to permanently or temporarily hold any individual who was detained as of october 1, 2009, at gitmo. now, you might wonder, we have been talking about this, we have passed -- i have actually passed two amendments that do exactly almost the same thing.

James Inhofe

1:10:48 to 1:11:09( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: we have passed an amendment to the 2007 resolution. it passed 94-3. a bipartisan amendment to the war supplemental. that was one that was offered by myself and senator inouye from hawaii. it's in confence. my concern is that in conference it may be removed, because let's

James Inhofe

1:11:10 to 1:11:31( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: keep in mind we sent this language to conference once before, and it came back and it merely said if the president announces a plan of what to do with those individuals who are incarcerated at gitmo, we would have 45 days to -- to discuss that, but it doesn't say that we ha he gives. so consequently, there are no

James Inhofe

1:11:32 to 1:11:53( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: teeth in that. this may be our only chance, and this is passes by 90-something to something else her so i will have that and i hope that people understand that the whole country was upset when they found out on friday the 13th -- that was a kind of interesting day for this to happen -- when khalid sheikh

James Inhofe

1:11:54 to 1:12:14( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: mohammed was announced by the president that he was going to be tried in new york city, and that they are going to be moving some five terrorist into t you know, i'm not going to debate this thing. i think it has been worn out in the press right now. people realize that if we're going to bring these terrorists to the united states, they're going to become cells, they're going to become targets for

James Inhofe

1:12:15 to 1:12:37( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: terrorist activity. and besides that, you can't try someone under our courts system that should be tried under a tribunal. we know the rules of evidence are different and we have a perfect place for that down in gitmo. so i will be offering that amendment. now, i was going to talk a little bit about the president's trip to china

James Inhofe

1:12:38 to 1:13:00( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: however, since it appears now evident, which we have known all along, and that is that we're not going to be in this country on cap-and-trade. we have the bill that's up right now by senators kerry and boxer. they have been talking about this now for eig every time that they talk about it, there is more and more opposition to it. right now, the interesting thing

James Inhofe

1:13:01 to 1:13:21( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: is the most recent polling shows that only 4% of the american people think this is really a problem, and the and the 96% are right. but nonetheless, over in china, let's keep in mind china's output of co2 emissions could amount to twi emissions of the world's hitchest nations, including the

James Inhofe

1:13:22 to 1:13:42( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: united states, the europea union, and japan. so consequently, the problem there is china, it's india, it's mexico, it's the developing countries. we all know that nothing is going to doesn't treat developing countries like -- as developed now, i'm not going to dwell on

James Inhofe

1:13:43 to 1:14:04( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: this -- i will at a later time because i plan to make a very long, well over an hour talk. i'm trying to get some time now to do this. this will be the fifth time that i've done this the last six years concerning this particular subject, and that subject is alleged global warming attached to the co2 emissions. but i would say this -- that a far as what is going on right

James Inhofe

1:14:05 to 1:14:29( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: now in china, the chinese are not going to line up and agree in copenhagen or anyplace else to start reducing their own emissions because, quite frankly, they are the ones who are the big beneficiaries. if we -- and this is kind of interesting, because even if we did it and the developed nations did it, that still would not have any material reduction in

James Inhofe

1:14:30 to 1:14:51( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: co2, even if you believe that co 2 or gases cause global warming or climate change. it's still not going to work. as tom quigley said way back when senator gore -- vice president gore at that time tried to do a study to determine what wonderful things were going to happen if we joined the kyoto

James Inhofe

1:14:52 to 1:15:13( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: treaty, and the question was to his own scientists if we were to -- if all nations, if all veloped nations, the united states, the european union and all that were to sign the kyoto treaty and live by its emission requirements, how much would it reduce the temperature, and this tom quigley, the renowned scientist, came out with his

James Inhofe

1:15:14 to 1:15:34( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: report and he said it would reduce it by one degree celsius by 2050. so all of the pain, all of the taxes, the largest tax increase in the history of america and it doesn't produce anything. so i don't think it's necessary to belabor that. china is not going to do it, no

James Inhofe

1:15:35 to 1:15:55( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: matter what the president does in his trip to china. i am concerned that we are going to be voting this afternoon on the nomination of david hamilton to be the seventh circuit court of appeals. i think hamilton is, without question, a liberal activist judge. he believes judges do not simply

James Inhofe

1:15:56 to 1:16:16( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: interpret the constitution of the united states, but the judges have the power to actually change the constitution when deciding cases, stating that -- and this is his quote. this is his quote, mr. president. he says, "part of our job as judges, part of our job as judges is to write a series of footnotes to the constitution." now, this is exactly what our

James Inhofe

1:16:17 to 1:16:39( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: founding fathers didn't want us to do. judges are supposed to interpret what we do in this chamber. when he was nominated to be in the district court in 1994, the american bar association rated him as not qualified. i of reasons now, i don't very often agree with vice president biden, but i

James Inhofe

1:16:40 to 1:17:00( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: have to say this, vice president biden made a statement some time ago that i do agree with, and that is if you states senate and you have a judge that's coming up or to be confirmed by the senate, and if you oppose that judge when it comes up for -- to be a federal judge, then later on when he

James Inhofe

1:17:01 to 1:17:23( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: wants to become a circuit judge or even a judge to the united states supreme court, if you opposed him at a lower position, you have to oppose him at the next position because the bar necessarily goes up. for that reason and many other reasons, i will be opposing him. i think it's important that in

James Inhofe

1:17:24 to 1:17:45( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: 2003, in a woman's choice vs. newman, hamilton issued an injunction against an indiana law that required abortion clinics to give women information about alternatives to abortions in the presence of a physician, nurse, or somebody else. just to have that information is inconceivable to me that this could happen.

James Inhofe

1:17:46 to 1:18:06( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: let's keep in mind also this is the same judge that had a ruling, the speaker -- perhaps the most infamous because of the his 2005 position while presing over the case of hendricks vs. basma in which he

James Inhofe

1:18:07 to 1:18:27( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: joined the speaker of indiana's house of representatives from permitting sectarian prayers to be offered as a part of that body's official proceedings, meaning that the chaplain or whomever opened the proceedings with a prayer could not invoke the con -- in his conclusion, hamilton wrote if the speaker chooses to continue any form of

James Inhofe

1:18:28 to 1:18:49( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: legislative prayer, he shall advise persons offering such a prayer that it must be nonsectarian, must not be used to advance any faith over the other. this is the first time or only time i believe this has happened in confirmation. this will be coming up for confirmation. i hope all of america will be

James Inhofe

1:18:50 to 1:19:10( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: aware of the fact that this is hafplgt i understand -- that this is happening. i understand they're getting very close and i want a couple of minutes to announce what is happening in the foreign relations committee. senator feingold has an amendment that i wholeheartedly agree with. it is actually not an amendment. it is a bill having to do with

James Inhofe

1:19:11 to 1:19:32( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: the l.r.a. let what that is. the resistance army is something taken for about 25 years, a guy named joseph cody in the northern part of uganda has been mutilating kids. you've heard of the child's army and all of this.

James Inhofe

1:19:33 to 1:19:55( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: they go into the villages and they kidnap these kids. they take them out, teach them how to be warriors. once they join up, they send them back to the village to murder their own par their own family. this has been going on for a long period of time. this amendment is something that i'm very excited that finally we have the attention of people here in the united states,

James Inhofe

1:19:56 to 1:20:17( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: that this animal named joseph coning. in the pas 18 years the l.r.a. has captured over 20,000 kids. i've been up there in northern ugan i've been up to guru. and i have wated these kids after they have been dismembered, after they cut their lips off and ears off and all of this.

James Inhofe

1:20:18 to 1:20:40( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: when this first came out, i was opposed to it because senator feingold had to pay for this bill a reduction in some of the funds that would otherwise go the united states air force. that has been taken out, so i join him now in saying that this is something that has to take place. this is the first time we've actually had the opportunity to bring this issue, to let it surface.

James Inhofe

1:20:41 to 1:21:01( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: i have personally talked to the president of uganda, the president of rwanda, president about the eastern of congo where joseph coning has kidnapped these kids, murdered these kids, mutilated these kids and i can tell from personal experience this is something we need to get involved in and we

James Inhofe

1:21:02 to 1:21:23( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: are doing it by virtue of this bill. with that, i have gone one minute past. i apologize to the managers of the and i yield the the presiding officer:orning business is closed. under the previous order, the senate will resume consideration of h.r. will

James Inhofe

1:21:24 to 1:21:46( Edit History Discussion )

James Inhofe: the clerk: calendar number 106, h.r. construction, the department veterans affairs, and related agencies, an so forth and for

There is currently no text in this page. You can search for this page title in other pages, search the related logs, or edit this page.

Personal tools

MetaVid is a non-profit project of UC Santa Cruz and the Sunlight Foundation. Learn more About MetaVid

The C-SPAN logo and other servicemarks that may be found in video content are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Metavid